New York City “regularly fails” to provide special education services to students with disabilities, leading to chronic absences, according to a class-action lawsuit filed Tuesday by the Legal Aid Society. This lawsuit is a significant step in addressing long-standing issues within the city’s educational system, particularly regarding the rights of students with disabilities. The suit not only highlights the systemic failures in providing essential support services but also underscores the urgent need for reform in how special education is delivered.
The suit seeks to confront a pervasive problem in the city’s school system, the nation’s largest. Tens of thousands of children may struggle to attend class because of anxiety, clinical depression, and other emotional disabilities, the suit says. These students have the right — enshrined in federal law — to have their needs accommodated by their public schools. This right is fundamental, as it ensures that every student, regardless of their challenges, has access to a quality education that meets their unique needs.
However, the city’s Education Department “has a pattern and practice” of falling short in providing evaluations, support services, and robust plans to help these children attend class, according to the complaint. This failure results in a “systematic, wholesale denial of access to education,” the suit argues. The ramifications of such failures are profound; students are not only missing out on essential educational opportunities but are also facing increased emotional and psychological distress as a result.
Among the students affected is H.B., a 16-year-old sophomore who is identified by his initials in the lawsuit to protect his privacy. He articulates the struggle he faces, stating that his anxiety makes it feel like he is watching his classes on “a really old TV” with the signal going in and out. This analogy reflects the disconnect and frustration many students with disabilities experience in a system that is supposed to support them.
When he was in sixth grade, his mother sought a special education plan — a legal document that outlines the support services and other accommodations to which a student is entitled. But it took almost the entire school year for him to receive one, the suit says. The delay in receiving this critical support illustrates the systemic inadequacies within the special education framework in New York City. In the meantime, administrators at his middle school told him that if he needed to leave class to collect himself, he could sit with the guidance counselor. Unfortunately, this suggestion led to a distressing experience; the counselor later reported his mother to child services for neglect, in a case that was eventually dismissed.
Today, H.B. attends school remotely. However, a requirement to keep his camera on all day triggers his anxiety, and he misses many hours of class time. This situation highlights a broader issue: the reliance on remote learning and its implications for students who already face challenges. The lack of appropriate accommodations exacerbates their struggles, making it even more difficult for them to engage with their education.
“It feels like there’s nothing there for people like me and for people in the same situations as me,” H.B. said. His sentiments resonate with many students and families navigating similar challenges. They often feel abandoned by a system that is supposed to support them, leaving them to fend for themselves in an educational landscape that does not recognize their needs.
Student absenteeism spiked in New York and other cities during the pandemic. And it has remained stubbornly high, becoming a top factor hampering the nation’s recovery from learning loss. Chronic absence is defined as missing at least 10 percent of the academic year. For students with disabilities, the stakes are particularly high. Research shows that students on special education plans miss school more often than their classmates. About 46 percent of New York City students with disabilities were chronically absent during the 2022-23 school year, the most recent period for which complete data is available, compared with 31 percent of their general education peers.
Moreover, in a set of several dozen schools across the city that educate children with the most advanced disabilities, known as District 75, more than six in 10 students were marked absent for at least 18 days over the course of the year. This staggering statistic emphasizes the urgent need for interventions that address the unique challenges faced by these students, particularly those in special education programs.
Missing class that frequently can quickly spiral into other problems. Students who are chronically absent in early grades are less likely to become proficient readers on time, and those who miss high school classes are often at a much higher risk for dropping out before graduation. The implications of these educational gaps extend beyond academics; they can affect a student’s overall well-being and future opportunities.
Still, high-profile litigation over student absenteeism has been rare. The lawsuit filed on Tuesday argues that absenteeism for some children with disabilities is directly linked to failures in the public school system. These failures are not just individual experiences but part of a broader pattern that highlights the systemic neglect of students’ rights.
“It’s wildly inconsistent what schools will do,” said Susan Horwitz, the supervising attorney of the Education Law Project at the Legal Aid Society, adding that well-off families might seek private help such as therapy and diagnostic evaluations to get their children back into school. This disparity in resources further exacerbates the challenges faced by students from low-income backgrounds, who may not have access to the same support systems as their more affluent peers.
As this lawsuit unfolds, it represents a crucial opportunity for advocacy and change. By shining a light on these issues, the Legal Aid Society aims to hold the city accountable for its responsibilities to provide adequate special education services. The hope is that this legal action will not only lead to meaningful change for the affected students but also spark a larger conversation about the rights of all students with disabilities within the education system.
“What about the poor kids?” she asked. “It’s fundamentally an equity, a poverty, a race, a civil rights issue.” This sentiment encapsulates the ongoing challenges faced by students with disabilities within the educational system, highlighting the intersection of various societal issues that contribute to their struggles.
In an ideal world, every student with a disability should receive a specialized learning plan from the Department of Education, crafted specifically to meet their individual needs. This plan is intended to ensure that these students have access to the same educational opportunities as their peers. In addition to personalized learning plans, the department also provides a variety of services tailored for students requiring additional support. These include behavioral assistance, advanced technology, and testing accommodations, all designed to create a more inclusive environment.
Chyann Tull, a spokeswoman for the department, addressed the claims made in a recent lawsuit, stating that the school system was “committed to reducing barriers to student attendance in any and all forms.” This commitment is crucial, especially for students whose disabilities significantly impact their ability to attend school regularly. She emphasized the importance of prioritizing support and programming for students with disabilities in their neighborhood schools, which can often provide a more familiar and comfortable learning environment.
Moreover, the department has made strides in expanding its Nest and Horizon programs, initiatives aimed at helping autistic students develop both social and academic skills. These programs have reportedly achieved high attendance rates, showcasing their effectiveness in engaging students who might otherwise struggle in traditional educational settings.
Despite these efforts, children can be chronically absent for a myriad of reasons. Some students may skip school for family vacations or to fulfill family obligations, while others face significant barriers to attendance. The lawsuit highlights a troubling trend: a “growing number of students whose disabilities create so much fear of approaching, entering and remaining in school” that they actively avoid their classes. This fear can stem from various factors, including anxiety related to the school environment or social interactions.
In dealing with these challenges, some schools adopt an unfortunate approach by suggesting that families opt for home-schooling until their children feel “better.” Such a recommendation can be disheartening for families seeking assistance. In other instances, districts may simply “ignore the situation” or refer parents to child welfare investigators. This response can worsen the very issues that led to the students’ absences, making it harder for families to navigate the complex web of support services available.
Jeffrey Metzler, a partner at the law firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, which is involved in the lawsuit alongside Legal Aid, pointed out the inconsistency in how schools address disabilities. He remarked that if children couldn’t read due to disabilities, it would be unacceptable for schools to say, “Well, that’s too hard of a problem to figure out.” Yet, when emotional disabilities hinder attendance, many schools tell families, “We really don’t have anything else to offer.” This disparity underscores a critical gap in the system and raises questions about the adequacy of special education resources and support.
Mr. Metzler advocates for the establishment of a standardized procedure within the school system for evaluating children’s issues and assisting them in returning to school. “It’s not a problem that can’t be solved,” he asserted, reflecting a hopeful vision for an education system that actively seeks to support all students.
For now, some students continue to wait for the help they need. Take, for example, M.T., a 15-year-old who started ninth grade this fall. M.T. has “high-functioning” autism and previously attended a school in District 75. Her mother recognized that as M.T. transitioned to high school, she would require more assistance to thrive in this new environment.
Consequently, she requested behavioral therapy from the district and sought placement for M.T. in a residential high school program that would offer more intensive support. However, the necessary therapy was never provided. Instead, M.T. faced rejections from 30 residential schools, some located as far away as Texas. During this time, her mother reported that M.T. experienced emotional outbursts at school and felt embarrassed to return.
In light of these challenges, her mother enrolled her in the city’s virtual schooling program, but M.T. misses her friends and the in-person experiences she cherished, such as art classes. Despite their best efforts to work with the Education Department, her mother expressed frustration at the lack of communication regarding alternative assistance since the rejections. “It’s not fair to her,” M.T.’s mother lamented, reflecting the deep sense of injustice that many families feel as they navigate the complexities of special education.
Another student, H.B., is focused on turning 17, at which point he can qualify for his high school equivalency diploma and leave the New York City school system behind. While the lawsuit may not alter his personal experiences at school, he hopes it can improve the situation for others facing similar challenges. “It’s OK for me to want people to pave the roads, because them being bumpy doesn’t make you a better person, right?” he said. “It just makes you afraid of the roads.”
In conclusion, the issues faced by students with disabilities within the educational system underscore the urgent need for reform. As society grapples with the complexities of equity, poverty, and civil rights, it becomes increasingly clear that all students deserve the resources and support necessary to thrive. Special education should not just be a legal obligation but a fundamental component of an equitable education system that embraces every child’s potential.
Discover Exceptional Support with Our Team
When seeking an ABA therapist in NYC, look no further than A Better Way ABA. Our dedicated team is committed to providing tailored interventions that cater to the unique needs of each child. We focus on fostering meaningful progress in a nurturing environment. If you’re ready to give your child the best opportunity for growth, contact us today to learn more about how we can support your family’s journey!